SILJ vs. SSG
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 8.82%/yr vs -61.87%/yr for SSG. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSG.
Performance
SILJ vs. SSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly higher than SSG's -57.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has outperformed SSG with an annualized return of 8.82%, while SSG has yielded a comparatively lower -61.87% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
SSG
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -60.52%
- 1Y
- -79.15%
- 3Y*
- -73.33%
- 5Y*
- -66.38%
- 10Y*
- -61.87%
SILJ vs. SSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -57.62% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and SSG is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | -0.19 |
The correlation between SILJ and SSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SILJ vs. SSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
SSG
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
SSG
-
Financial Services
SILJ
SSG
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
SSG
-
Communication Services
SILJ
SSG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Energy
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Healthcare
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Industrials
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Real Estate
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Technology
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Utilities
SILJ
-
SSG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. SSG — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
SSG
SILJ vs. SSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.72 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.97 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | -1.52 | +7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. SSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum SSG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -100.00% | +20.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | -81.04% | +41.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -98.49% | +59.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.55% | -99.64% | +46.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -99.99% | +29.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -100.00% | +67.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -88.59% | +47.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.17% | 51.46% | -36.29% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. SSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 20.76%, while Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 28.87% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.36% | 52.78% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.54% | 65.95% | -9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 78.00% | -33.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 69.35% | -22.94% |
SILJ vs. SSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SSG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. SSG - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than SSG's 12.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 12.32% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and SSG have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to SILJ (20.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs SSG's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 8.82% vs -61.87% for SSG. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 20.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 8.82% return vs -61.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.32%, compared with 2.04% for SILJ.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while SSG is Leveraged Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.95% for SSG.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and SSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer