PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 10.08%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%

SIVR

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.85%
6M
24.90%
1Y
110.95%
3Y*
45.38%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
2.85%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and SIVR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.73

The correlation between SILJ and SIVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJSIVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.90

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

2.07

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.63

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.99

5.67

+2.32

SILJ vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJSIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.90

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.50

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.32

-0.23

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-75.85%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-42.42%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-42.42%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.47%

-42.42%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-42.42%

-27.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-37.25%

+10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-47.85%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

19.64%

-5.58%

Volatility

SILJ vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 16.28%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

16.28%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

58.30%

-13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.90%

58.84%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.35%

36.17%

+8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

31.87%

+14.37%

SILJ vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILJ and SIVR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to SIVR (16.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 15.77% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 16.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.30% for SIVR.

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer