SILJ vs. RGLD
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while RGLD (Royal Gold, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 8.82%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for RGLD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SILJ vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's -6.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 8.82%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
RGLD
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 6M
- -4.74%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
SILJ vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | -6.25% | 70.43% | 10.39% | 8.70% | 8.51% | 0.04% | -12.13% | 44.27% | 5.53% | 31.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and RGLD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SILJ and RGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
RGLD
SILJ vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 0.48 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 1.27 | +4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and RGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -98.29% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | -35.12% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -35.12% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.55% | -40.73% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -49.55% | -20.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -31.66% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -29.82% | -11.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.17% | 13.34% | +1.83% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) at 12.33%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 12.33% | +8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.36% | 32.22% | +15.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.54% | 39.34% | +17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 31.58% | +13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 33.66% | +12.75% |
Dividends
SILJ vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than RGLD's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 0.89% | 0.81% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 1.17% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and RGLD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to RGLD (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs RGLD's -98.29%.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and RGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer