SILJ vs. RBIL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SILJ returned 63.87% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

SILJ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.66% return.

SILJ

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -6.44%
• 6M: -16.79%
• YTD: -8.10%
• 1Y: 63.87%
• 3Y*: 42.82%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

RBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 2.48%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-8.10%	155.12%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.66%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and RBIL is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 41
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SILJ	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	4.54	-3.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	7.04	-5.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	2.20	-0.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	7.57	-5.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	32.59	-28.57

SILJ vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-0.56%	-78.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.28%	-0.56%	-38.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.90%	-0.17%	-36.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.37%	-0.08%	-41.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.72%	0.13%	+17.59%

Volatility

SILJ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 17.40% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.40%	0.33%	+17.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.84%	0.86%	+46.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.73%	0.94%	+56.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.02%	1.06%	+43.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.40%	1.06%	+45.34%

SILJ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILJ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than RBIL's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.37%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.18%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and RBIL in my portfolio?

SILJ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SILJ or RBIL?

SILJ has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, SILJ or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, SILJ leads with 63.87% vs 4.20% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SILJ or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 63.87% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILJ or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SILJ or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.18% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between SILJ and RBIL?

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.