SILJ vs. GDX
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 10.08%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for GDX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
SILJ vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
SILJ vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and GDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SILJ and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SILJ vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
GDX
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
GDX
Financial Services
SILJ
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
GDX
-
Communication Services
SILJ
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Energy
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Healthcare
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Industrials
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Real Estate
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Technology
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Utilities
SILJ
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
GDX
SILJ vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SILJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.35 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.76 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.00 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 5.13 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SILJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.35 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.52 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.13 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -80.34% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -30.84% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -30.84% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.47% | -46.51% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -49.79% | -20.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.80% | -26.62% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -40.43% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | 11.99% | +2.07% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 15.40%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.69% | 15.40% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 37.50% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.90% | 45.49% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.35% | 36.39% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 37.18% | +9.06% |
SILJ vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SILJ and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to GDX (15.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 15.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while GDX is Gold. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.51% for GDX.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer