PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and GDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.85

The correlation between SILJ and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SILJ vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SILJ
GDX

Basic Materials

99.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SILJ
99.8%
GDX
100.0%

Financial Services

SILJ
0.3%
GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

SILJ
0.2%
GDX

-

Communication Services

SILJ
0.0%
GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Energy

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Industrials

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Technology

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Utilities

SILJ

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.35

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

1.76

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.00

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.99

5.13

+2.86

SILJ vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.35

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.52

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.38

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.13

-0.04

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-80.34%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-30.84%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-30.84%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.47%

-46.51%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-49.79%

-20.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-26.62%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-40.43%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

11.99%

+2.07%

Volatility

SILJ vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 15.40%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

15.40%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

37.50%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.90%

45.49%

+9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.35%

36.39%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

37.18%

+9.06%

SILJ vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SILJ and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to GDX (15.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 15.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while GDX is Gold. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.51% for GDX.

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer