SILJ vs. GBUG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. SILJ is passively managed, while GBUG is actively managed. Over the past year, SILJ returned 111.95% vs 61.69% for GBUG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GBUG.

Performance

SILJ vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than GBUG's -2.59% return.

SILJ

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 111.95%
• 3Y*: 47.77%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

GBUG

• 1D: -3.86%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: -2.59%
• 6M: 6.69%
• 1Y: 61.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	6.61%	144.08%
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-2.59%	119.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and GBUG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.93

The correlation between SILJ and GBUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 35
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SILJ	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.30	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.72	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	1.93	+1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	4.98	+3.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SILJ vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and GBUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SILJ	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.30	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	1.71	-1.62

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and GBUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	GBUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-32.10%	-46.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.71%	-32.10%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.80%	-26.84%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.43%	-7.62%	-33.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.06%	12.42%	+1.64%

Volatility

SILJ vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) at 15.39%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	GBUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.69%	15.39%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.24%	39.40%	+5.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.90%	47.61%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.35%	47.38%	-3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.24%	47.38%	-1.14%

SILJ vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILJ vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than GBUG's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.60%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.88%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and GBUG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SILJ and GBUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SILJ or GBUG?

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to GBUG (15.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs GBUG's -32.10%.

Which ETF is better, SILJ or GBUG?

On 1-year performance, SILJ leads with 111.95% vs 61.69% for GBUG. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, GBUG has been the lower-risk option at 15.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SILJ or GBUG?

Over the 1-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 111.95% return vs 61.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILJ or GBUG?

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SILJ or GBUG?

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.60% for GBUG.

What is the main difference between SILJ and GBUG?

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while GBUG is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.89% for GBUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.