SILJ vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and 2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while 2807.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SILJ returned 13.63%/yr vs -5.01%/yr for 2807.HK. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for 2807.HK.

Performance

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SILJ is traded in USD, while 2807.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2807.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -14.24% return, which is significantly lower than 2807.HK's -9.72% return.

SILJ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -15.01%
• 6M: -29.16%
• YTD: -14.24%
• 1Y: 61.72%
• 3Y*: 36.21%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: 5.23%
• ALL TIME*: 2.39%

2807.HK

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -19.19%
• 6M: -20.42%
• YTD: -9.72%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 1.48%
• 5Y*: -5.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-14.24%	183.89%	6.39%	-5.21%	-15.42%	-23.21%	-0.45%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	-9.72%	23.25%	6.21%	1.73%	-33.66%	10.73%	20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and 2807.HK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020	0.14

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 37
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 17
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SILJ	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.34	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.67	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.08	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	0.50	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	1.09	+2.21

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and 2807.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than 2807.HK's maximum drawdown of -52.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-52.15%	-26.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.12%	-21.87%	-19.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.12%	-34.56%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.29%	-49.44%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.12%	-28.27%	-12.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-27.10%	-14.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.73%	9.81%	+8.92%

Volatility

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 13.31%, while Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	14.05%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.78%	24.69%	+23.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.99%	32.33%	+25.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.00%	33.19%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.34%	33.51%	+12.83%

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than 2807.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILJ vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while 2807.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.34%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and 2807.HK in my portfolio?

SILJ and 2807.HK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SILJ or 2807.HK?

On fees, 2807.HK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILJ or 2807.HK?

2807.HK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between SILJ and 2807.HK?

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while 2807.HK is China Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while 2807.HK tracks FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.68% for 2807.HK.