PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2807.HK vs. MMA.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2807.HK is traded in HKD, while MMA.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the MMA.AX values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2807.HK achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than MMA.AX's -0.16% return.


2807.HK

1D
0.15%
1M
5.49%
YTD
11.69%
6M
20.72%
1Y
41.03%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

MMA.AX

1D
-1.80%
1M
25.17%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
19.42%
1Y
86.82%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
2807.HK
Global X China Robotics and AI ETF
11.69%23.46%5.68%1.71%-3.86%
MMA.AX
Maronan Metals Limited
-0.16%116.04%-28.35%-5.43%-19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between 2807.HK and MMA.AX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022

0.15

The correlation between 2807.HK and MMA.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2807.HK
2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MMA.AX
MMA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2807.HKMMA.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.58

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

3.00

+1.62

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2807.HK and MMA.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2807.HKMMA.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.95

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.05

+0.03

Drawdowns

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2807.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.88%, smaller than the maximum MMA.AX drawdown of -57.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2807.HK and MMA.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2807.HKMMA.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.88%

-57.13%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-54.45%

+33.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.43%

-54.45%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.92%

-40.37%

+29.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.88%

-37.07%

+10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

28.77%

-19.70%

Volatility

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) is 8.52%, while Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX) has a volatility of 23.98%. This indicates that 2807.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2807.HKMMA.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

23.98%

-15.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.67%

72.08%

-51.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

90.47%

-61.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.63%

77.07%

-44.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.74%

77.07%

-44.33%

Dividends

2807.HK vs. MMA.AX - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2807.HK nor MMA.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2807.HK and MMA.AX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2807.HK and MMA.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer