2807.HK vs. 3191.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK).

2807.HK and 3191.HK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2807.HK is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. It was launched on Aug 6, 2020. 3191.HK is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Factset China Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Aug 6, 2020. Both 2807.HK and 3191.HK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	-7.55%	23.46%	5.68%	1.71%	-33.54%	11.35%	5.75%
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	-3.73%	41.08%	11.15%	-6.56%	-39.25%	19.31%	-1.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2807.HK achieves a -7.55% return, which is significantly lower than 3191.HK's -3.73% return.

2807.HK

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: -11.26%
• YTD: -7.55%
• 6M: -18.02%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: -2.28%
• 5Y*: -2.44%
• 10Y*: —

3191.HK

• 1D: -3.10%
• 1M: -10.40%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 6M: -13.35%
• 1Y: 38.02%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 1.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2807.HK and 3191.HK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

2807.HK

Global X China Robotics and AI ETF

3191.HK

Global X China Semiconductor ETF

Return for Risk

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 19
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 15

3191.HK

3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 50
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2807.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	1.05	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.50	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.21	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	1.65	-1.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	4.22	-3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2807.HK and 3191.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2807.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	1.05	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.04	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.00	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between 2807.HK and 3191.HK is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2807.HK nor 3191.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2807.HK drawdown since its inception was -51.88%, smaller than the maximum 3191.HK drawdown of -63.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2807.HK and 3191.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	2807.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.88%	-63.76%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.31%	-21.43%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.29%	-63.76%	+14.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.27%	-26.24%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.24%	-34.59%	+7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.44%	8.36%	+2.08%

Volatility

2807.HK vs. 3191.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) is 9.19%, while Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that 2807.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3191.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2807.HK	3191.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	12.06%	-2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.25%	25.98%	-4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.64%	37.31%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.42%	39.20%	-6.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.76%	38.94%	-6.18%