SILJ vs. 1816.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while 1816.HK (CGN Power) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 5.23%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for 1816.HK. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and CGN Power (1816.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SILJ is traded in USD, while 1816.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1816.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -14.24% return, which is significantly lower than 1816.HK's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed 1816.HK with an annualized return of 5.23%, while 1816.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 6.60% annualized return.

SILJ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -15.01%
• 6M: -29.16%
• YTD: -14.24%
• 1Y: 61.72%
• 3Y*: 36.21%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: 5.23%
• ALL TIME*: 2.39%

1816.HK

• 1D: 5.52%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: -5.63%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: 4.32%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 15.82%
• 10Y*: 6.60%
• ALL TIME*: 2.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-14.24%	183.89%	6.39%	-5.21%	-15.42%	-23.21%	33.00%	57.06%	-27.95%	-5.65%
1816.HK CGN Power	0.63%	6.86%	45.27%	15.27%	-17.71%	49.08%	-15.53%	16.96%	-9.12%	1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and 1816.HK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014	0.04

The correlation between SILJ and 1816.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. 1816.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 37
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

1816.HK

1816.HK Risk / Return Rank: 49
1816.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
1816.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
1816.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
1816.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
1816.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and CGN Power (1816.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SILJ	1816.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.17	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.47	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.05	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	0.16	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	0.44	+2.87

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the 1816.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and 1816.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than 1816.HK's maximum drawdown of -68.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and 1816.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	1816.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-68.30%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.12%	-27.17%	-13.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.12%	-35.10%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.29%	-35.10%	-13.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	-35.10%	-34.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.12%	-20.80%	-20.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-46.90%	+5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.73%	10.08%	+8.65%

Volatility

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to CGN Power (1816.HK) at 8.03%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1816.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	1816.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	8.03%	+5.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.78%	20.18%	+27.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.99%	26.56%	+31.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.00%	30.39%	+14.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.34%	26.54%	+19.80%

Dividends

SILJ vs. 1816.HK - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than 1816.HK's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1816.HK CGN Power	3.42%	3.52%	3.62%	4.74%	5.31%	4.08%	4.97%	4.05%	4.48%	2.73%	2.34%	0.11%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.34%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and 1816.HK in my portfolio?

SILJ and 1816.HK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.