SIL vs. SQQQ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIL returned 9.24%/yr vs -55.68%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. SIL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.

Performance

SIL vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 9.24%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.68% annualized return.

SIL

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -18.16%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 66.61%
• 3Y*: 44.84%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

SQQQ

• 1D: -4.47%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: -39.28%
• 6M: -36.43%
• 1Y: -60.85%
• 3Y*: -54.68%
• 5Y*: -47.98%
• 10Y*: -55.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIL vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-4.72%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	-39.28%	-53.05%	-49.79%	-73.61%	82.40%	-60.87%	-86.40%	-65.92%	-20.83%	-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and SQQQ is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010	-0.27

The correlation between SIL and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to -0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIL vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIL	SQQQ
Basic Materials	99.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	103.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SIL vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 40
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SQQQ

SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 0
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIL	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	-1.22	+2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	-2.26	+3.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.76	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	-0.93	+2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.05	-1.69	+6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIL vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIL	SQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	-1.22	+2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	-0.72	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	-0.84	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	-0.87	+0.99

Drawdowns

SIL vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and SQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIL	SQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.99%	-100.00%	+17.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.91%	-65.71%	+32.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.91%	-92.38%	+59.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.08%	-97.23%	+42.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.04%	-99.98%	+36.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.58%	-100.00%	+67.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.43%	-92.40%	+40.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	35.98%	-22.74%

Volatility

SIL vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is 18.38%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that SIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIL	SQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.38%	19.65%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.02%	39.23%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.09%	50.16%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.48%	66.95%	-27.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.73%	66.30%	-26.57%

SIL vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIL vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than SQQQ's 11.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.24%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ	11.25%	9.36%	10.23%	8.01%	0.28%	0.00%	2.15%	2.92%	1.47%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIL and SQQQ in my portfolio?

SIL and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIL or SQQQ?

SQQQ has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to SIL (18.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, SIL or SQQQ?

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 9.24% vs -55.68% for SQQQ. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SIL has been the lower-risk option at 18.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIL or SQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 9.24% return vs -55.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIL or SQQQ?

SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIL or SQQQ?

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 1.24% for SIL.

What is the main difference between SIL and SQQQ?

SIL is categorized as Silver, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIL and 0.95% for SQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.