SII vs. LRCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Inc (SII) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).

Performance

SII vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Inc (SII) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SII vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SII Sprott Inc	46.30%	137.17%	27.39%	5.00%	-24.09%	59.43%	-11.70%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	24.97%	139.16%	-6.84%	88.63%	-40.72%	53.66%	54.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SII : $2.68B LRCX : $270.39B
EPS SII : $4.19 LRCX : $4.89
PE Ratio SII : 34.09 LRCX : 43.69
PEG Ratio SII : 0.68 LRCX : 3.31
PS Ratio SII : 8.41 LRCX : 13.20
PB Ratio SII : 5.34 LRCX : 26.65
Total Revenue (TTM) SII : $318.78M LRCX : $20.56B
Gross Profit (TTM) SII : $206.43M LRCX : $10.24B
EBITDA (TTM) SII : $109.60M LRCX : $7.43B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SII achieves a 46.30% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 24.97% return.

SII

• 1D: 6.68%
• 1M: -11.62%
• YTD: 46.30%
• 6M: 72.99%
• 1Y: 223.91%
• 3Y*: 61.57%
• 5Y*: 32.29%
• 10Y*: —

LRCX

• 1D: 6.87%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 6M: 60.02%
• 1Y: 196.05%
• 3Y*: 60.68%
• 5Y*: 28.66%
• 10Y*: 40.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SII vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SII

SII Risk / Return Rank: 99
SII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SII Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SII Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SII Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SII Martin Ratio Rank: 99

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SII vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Inc (SII) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SII	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.59	3.67	+1.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.08	3.58	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.50	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.39	9.82	+1.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	31.53	31.04	+0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SII vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SII Sharpe Ratio is 5.59, which is higher than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SII and LRCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SII	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.59	3.67	+1.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.63	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.41	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between SII and LRCX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SII vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

SII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than LRCX's 0.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SII Sprott Inc	0.98%	1.33%	2.49%	2.95%	3.00%	2.22%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.47%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%

Drawdowns

SII vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SII drawdown since its inception was -47.81%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SII and LRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SII	LRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.81%	-87.90%	+40.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.01%	-20.01%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.81%	-56.39%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.12%	-14.26%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-28.31%	+7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.23%	6.33%	+0.90%

Volatility

SII vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Inc (SII) is 15.47%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that SII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SII	LRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.47%	20.58%	-5.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.31%	40.44%	-7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.34%	53.75%	-13.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.70%	45.53%	-9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.17%	44.09%	-7.92%

Financials

SII vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sprott Inc and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 147.24M and revenue of 157.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.8%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.65B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

SII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 55.66M and revenue of 157.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.9%.

SII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 40.02M and revenue of 157.05M, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.59B and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.