SII vs. MUX
SII (Sprott Inc) and MUX (McEwen Mining Inc.) are both stocks. SII operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while MUX operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SII returned 25.88%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for MUX. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SII vs. MUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SII achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly higher than MUX's -6.59% return.
SII
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- -10.41%
- 6M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 56.98%
- 3Y*
- 50.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.50%
MUX
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -28.41%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- 72.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- -9.01%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.08M | $14.43M | $22.88M | |
SII Sprott Inc | $12.82M | $17.25M | $21.64M |
SII vs. MUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII Sprott Inc | 5.79% | 137.17% | 27.39% | 5.00% | -24.09% | 59.43% | -19.45% |
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | -6.59% | 137.92% | 7.91% | 23.04% | -33.90% | -10.00% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SII and MUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SII and MUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SII:
$2.66B
MUX:
$1.03B
SII:
$3.62
MUX:
$1.22
SII:
28.47
MUX:
14.14
SII:
0.76
MUX:
0.41
SII:
6.38
MUX:
6.46
SII:
5.01
MUX:
1.92
SII:
$377.77M
MUX:
$161.86M
SII:
$278.09M
MUX:
$53.23M
SII:
$120.39M
MUX:
$52.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SII vs. MUX — Risk / Return Rank
SII
MUX
SII vs. MUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Inc (SII) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SII | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.62 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 3.26 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SII vs. MUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SII drawdown since its inception was -47.81%, smaller than the maximum MUX drawdown of -99.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SII and MUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SII | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.81% | -99.67% | +51.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.01% | -43.65% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.01% | -46.49% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | -75.92% | +28.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.90% | -94.25% | +56.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -86.50% | +65.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.20% | 21.62% | -5.42% |
Volatility
SII vs. MUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Inc (SII) is 11.55%, while McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that SII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SII | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 15.38% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.12% | 50.25% | -9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.36% | 67.72% | -18.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.20% | 63.37% | -25.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 63.47% | -25.47% |
Dividends
SII vs. MUX - Dividend Comparison
SII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while MUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.47% |
SII Sprott Inc | 1.46% | 1.33% | 2.49% | 2.95% | 3.00% | 2.22% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SII vs. MUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Inc and McEwen Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SII and MUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to SII (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SII dropped -47.81% vs MUX's -99.67%.
SII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SII and MUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer