PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIG vs. PHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SIG vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SIG has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 2.83%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.20% annualized return.


SIG

1D
-1.63%
1M
18.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
3.75%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
2.83%

PHM

1D
-0.67%
1M
11.86%
YTD
5.26%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*
22.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIG vs. PHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
9.70%4.46%-23.85%59.64%-20.96%220.69%27.22%-26.28%-42.19%-38.94%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
5.26%8.54%6.22%128.76%-19.22%34.03%12.55%51.33%-20.76%83.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SIG and PHM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.26

The correlation between SIG and PHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIG:

$3.65B

PHM:

$23.88B

EPS

SIG:

$7.11

PHM:

$10.36

PE Ratio

SIG:

12.70

PHM:

11.88

PEG Ratio

SIG:

0.05

PHM:

0.84

PS Ratio

SIG:

0.54

PHM:

1.44

PB Ratio

SIG:

1.92

PHM:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIG:

$6.83B

PHM:

$16.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIG:

$2.66B

PHM:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

SIG:

$601.70M

PHM:

$2.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIG vs. PHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIG
SIG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PHM
PHM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIG vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIGPHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.13

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.85

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

1.66

-0.42

SIG vs. PHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIG and PHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIG vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIG drawdown since its inception was -95.53%, roughly equal to the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIG and PHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIGPHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.53%

-92.40%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.73%

-22.60%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.12%

-38.01%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.12%

-38.01%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.23%

-62.11%

-31.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.24%

-16.36%

-9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-35.47%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

11.62%

+1.24%

Volatility

SIG vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) at 9.64%. This indicates that SIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIGPHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

9.64%

+4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.06%

23.60%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

34.34%

+12.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.06%

34.72%

+18.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.30%

36.49%

+28.81%

Dividends

SIG vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

SIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than PHM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.78%0.78%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
1.45%1.51%1.36%0.83%1.15%0.41%1.36%6.81%4.47%2.10%1.06%0.68%

Financials

SIG vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Signet Jewelers Limited and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.55B
3.41B
(SIG) Total Revenue
(PHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SIG vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Signet Jewelers Limited and PulteGroup, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
35.8%
24.1%
Portfolio components
SIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported a gross profit of 556.50M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

SIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported an operating income of 36.90M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

SIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported a net income of 31.70M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIG and PHM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIG has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to PHM (9.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIG dropped -95.53% vs PHM's -92.40%.

PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIG and PHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer