PHM vs. SSD
Compare and contrast key facts about PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHM or SSD.
Correlation
The correlation between PHM and SSD is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PHM vs. SSD - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PHM:
-0.35
SSD:
-0.34
PHM:
-0.29
SSD:
-0.37
PHM:
0.97
SSD:
0.96
PHM:
-0.31
SSD:
-0.35
PHM:
-0.61
SSD:
-0.96
PHM:
19.29%
SSD:
12.45%
PHM:
34.08%
SSD:
30.62%
PHM:
-92.40%
SSD:
-68.15%
PHM:
-30.97%
SSD:
-26.10%
Fundamentals
PHM:
$20.72B
SSD:
$6.61B
PHM:
$14.16
SSD:
$7.68
PHM:
7.24
SSD:
20.51
PHM:
0.30
SSD:
1.47
PHM:
1.15
SSD:
2.95
PHM:
1.68
SSD:
3.45
PHM:
$17.89B
SSD:
$2.24B
PHM:
$5.22B
SSD:
$1.03B
PHM:
$3.96B
SSD:
$527.61M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than SSD's -4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed SSD with an annualized return of 19.68%, while SSD has yielded a comparatively lower 18.22% annualized return.
PHM
-5.70%
9.38%
-22.47%
-12.30%
29.80%
19.68%
SSD
-4.70%
6.53%
-16.49%
-9.92%
17.32%
18.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHM vs. SSD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PHM
SSD
PHM vs. SSD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PHM vs. SSD - Dividend Comparison
PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than SSD's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% | 1.07% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
PHM vs. SSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than SSD's maximum drawdown of -68.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and SSD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
PHM vs. SSD - Volatility Comparison
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) at 7.07%. This indicates that PHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
PHM vs. SSD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHM vs. SSD - Profitability Comparison
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 252.04M and revenue of 538.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 780.20M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 102.32M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 522.80M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 77.88M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.