PHM vs. SSD
PHM (PulteGroup, Inc.) and SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.) are both stocks. PHM operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while SSD operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PHM returned 21.09%/yr vs 17.75%/yr for SSD. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PHM vs. SSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than SSD's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed SSD with an annualized return of 21.09%, while SSD has yielded a comparatively lower 17.75% annualized return.
PHM
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 9.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.31%
- 10Y*
- 21.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.45%
SSD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $287.80M | $235.56M | $228.62M | |
| $62.45M | $58.74M | $62.47M |
PHM vs. SSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 8.31% | 8.54% | 6.22% | 128.76% | -19.22% | 34.03% | 12.55% | 51.33% | -20.76% | 83.43% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 16.85% | -1.95% | -15.74% | 125.36% | -35.62% | 50.20% | 17.51% | 50.84% | -4.39% | 33.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHM and SSD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 1994 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, PHM and SSD have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PHM:
$24.41B
SSD:
$7.72B
PHM:
$9.76
SSD:
$9.14
PHM:
12.96
SSD:
20.54
PHM:
0.92
SSD:
2.45
PHM:
1.51
SSD:
3.21
PHM:
1.88K
SSD:
3.10
PHM:
$16.41B
SSD:
$2.42B
PHM:
$4.01B
SSD:
$1.11B
PHM:
$2.40B
SSD:
$604.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHM vs. SSD — Risk / Return Rank
PHM
SSD
PHM vs. SSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHM | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.26 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 0.47 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHM vs. SSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than SSD's maximum drawdown of -68.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and SSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHM | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -68.16% | -24.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -20.38% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.01% | -34.40% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.01% | -44.50% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.11% | -44.50% | -17.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -11.16% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -16.33% | -19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.11% | 11.27% | +0.84% |
Volatility
PHM vs. SSD - Volatility Comparison
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a higher volatility of 10.22% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) at 8.89%. This indicates that PHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHM | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 8.89% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.51% | 22.07% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.32% | 29.24% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.97% | 31.63% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 32.39% | +4.22% |
Dividends
PHM vs. SSD - Dividend Comparison
PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than SSD's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% |
Financials
PHM vs. SSD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHM vs. SSD - Profitability Comparison
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 825.45M and revenue of 3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.7%.
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 318.19M and revenue of 671.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 442.49M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 169.13M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 472.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 127.04M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHM and SSD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHM has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to SSD (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs SSD's -68.16%.
PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHM and SSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer