PHM vs. GRBK
PHM (PulteGroup, Inc.) and GRBK (Green Brick Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Residential Construction industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, PHM returned 22.68%/yr vs 26.38%/yr for GRBK. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PHM vs. GRBK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than GRBK's 18.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has underperformed GRBK with an annualized return of 22.68%, while GRBK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.38% annualized return.
PHM
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 19.96%
- 10Y*
- 22.68%
GRBK
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 27.21%
- 10Y*
- 26.38%
PHM vs. GRBK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 8.38% | 8.54% | 6.22% | 128.76% | -19.22% | 34.03% | 12.55% | 51.33% | -20.76% | 83.43% |
GRBK Green Brick Partners, Inc. | 18.98% | 10.92% | 8.76% | 114.36% | -20.11% | 32.10% | 100.00% | 58.56% | -35.93% | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHM and GRBK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2007 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, PHM and GRBK have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PHM:
$24.53B
GRBK:
$3.25B
PHM:
$10.36
GRBK:
$6.86
PHM:
12.21
GRBK:
10.87
PHM:
0.86
GRBK:
0.51
PHM:
1.48
GRBK:
1.58
PHM:
1.89
GRBK:
1.74
PHM:
$16.83B
GRBK:
$2.06B
PHM:
$4.39B
GRBK:
$615.58M
PHM:
$2.76B
GRBK:
$397.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHM vs. GRBK — Risk / Return Rank
PHM
GRBK
PHM vs. GRBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHM | GRBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.71 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 1.33 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHM vs. GRBK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, smaller than the maximum GRBK drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and GRBK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHM | GRBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -99.29% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -23.99% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.01% | -36.15% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.01% | -45.12% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.11% | -54.29% | -7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -67.10% | +53.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -87.55% | +52.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.76% | 12.78% | -1.02% |
Volatility
PHM vs. GRBK - Volatility Comparison
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK) have volatilities of 9.16% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHM | GRBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 9.36% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.05% | 24.72% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.37% | 35.52% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.79% | 42.87% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.51% | 43.68% | -7.17% |
Dividends
PHM vs. GRBK - Dividend Comparison
PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while GRBK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRBK Green Brick Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% |
Financials
PHM vs. GRBK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Green Brick Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHM vs. GRBK - Profitability Comparison
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
GRBK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Brick Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 131.72M and revenue of 455.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
GRBK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Brick Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 131.72M and revenue of 455.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
GRBK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Brick Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 60.95M and revenue of 455.99M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHM and GRBK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRBK has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to PHM (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs GRBK's -99.29%.
PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHM and GRBK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer