SIFAX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 9.34% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIFAX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SIFAX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 3.95%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
SIFAX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIFAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIFAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
SIFAX
FASGX
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.21 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 1.73 | +1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 1.55 | +2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 6.89 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.21 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.53 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIFAX and FASGX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
SIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.16% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIFAX drawdown since its inception was -23.62%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFAX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -47.35% | +23.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -9.07% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.32% | -23.54% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.69% | -27.20% | +12.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.95% | +7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -6.74% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 2.04% | -0.79% |
Volatility
SIFAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) is 2.03%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that SIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 4.57% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.91% | 7.78% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.30% | 12.82% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.50% | 12.14% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.16% | 12.56% | -7.40% |