SIBAX vs. SSCDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX).

SIBAX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Dec 30, 1993. SSCDX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015.

Performance

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund	-7.32%	13.57%	18.02%	22.64%	-20.90%	17.10%	20.75%	20.71%	-2.75%	17.73%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	3.52%	12.90%	15.50%	15.50%	-17.15%	23.46%	16.21%	27.12%	-17.10%	13.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIBAX achieves a -7.32% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SIBAX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.

SIBAX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: -7.32%
• 6M: -5.15%
• 1Y: 10.39%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

SSCDX

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 24.10%
• 3Y*: 14.77%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIBAX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.

SSCDX

Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund

SIBAX

SIT Balanced Fund

Return for Risk

SIBAX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIBAX

SIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
SIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

SSCDX

SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 69
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIBAX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.16	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.71	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.69	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.27	7.32	-3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the SSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIBAX and SSCDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIBAX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.16	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.37	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.48	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.43	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SIBAX and SSCDX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison

SIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than SSCDX's 2.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund	3.66%	3.39%	2.46%	1.36%	4.93%	4.02%	1.55%	6.37%	2.05%	5.20%	1.62%	6.53%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	2.13%	2.21%	1.79%	1.07%	4.26%	8.47%	0.77%	1.33%	2.69%	0.85%	1.16%	0.87%

Drawdowns

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.93%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIBAX and SSCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIBAX	SSCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.93%	-38.79%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-13.18%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.75%	-27.06%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	-38.79%	+14.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.44%	-8.22%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-7.09%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	3.04%	-0.85%

Volatility

SIBAX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) is 3.37%, while Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that SIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIBAX	SSCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	5.97%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.02%	12.14%	-5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	20.88%	-8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	20.03%	-7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.17%	20.62%	-8.45%