SIBAX vs. SNGVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SIBAX (SIT Balanced Fund) and SNGVX (SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund) are both mutual funds - SIBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Sit, while SNGVX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Sit. Over the past 10 years, SIBAX returned 10.53%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for SNGVX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIBAX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SNGVX.

Performance

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIBAX achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than SNGVX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SIBAX has outperformed SNGVX with an annualized return of 10.53%, while SNGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.

SIBAX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 3.33%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

SNGVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 1.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund	3.33%	13.57%	18.02%	22.64%	-20.90%	17.10%	20.75%	20.71%	-2.75%	17.73%
SNGVX SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund	0.51%	6.93%	2.41%	3.22%	-4.80%	-1.15%	3.53%	3.34%	1.80%	1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SIBAX and SNGVX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994	0.02

Over the past year, SIBAX and SNGVX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SIBAX vs. SNGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIBAX

SIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
SIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SNGVX

SNGVX Risk / Return Rank: 25
SNGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SNGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SNGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SNGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SNGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIBAX	SNGVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.39	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.08	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.69	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	4.81	+2.81

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SNGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIBAX and SNGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.93%, which is greater than SNGVX's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIBAX and SNGVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIBAX	SNGVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.93%	-9.17%	-31.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-2.41%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.44%	-4.04%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.75%	-9.17%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	-9.17%	-15.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-1.26%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-0.83%	-6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	0.85%	+1.30%

Volatility

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) at 0.85%. This indicates that SIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIBAX	SNGVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	0.85%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.76%	2.20%	+5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	2.94%	+6.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.55%	3.73%	+8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.26%	2.97%	+9.29%

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIBAX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SNGVX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIBAX vs. SNGVX - Dividend Comparison

SIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than SNGVX's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIBAX SIT Balanced Fund	3.25%	3.39%	2.46%	1.36%	4.93%	4.02%	1.55%	6.37%	2.05%	5.20%	1.62%	6.53%
SNGVX SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund	3.81%	3.76%	3.78%	3.23%	1.70%	0.75%	1.40%	2.18%	2.05%	1.60%	1.63%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIBAX and SNGVX in my portfolio?

SIBAX and SNGVX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIBAX or SNGVX?

SIBAX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to SNGVX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIBAX dropped -40.93% vs SNGVX's -9.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.