SSCDX vs. SSMGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SSCDX (Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund) and SSMGX (SIT Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SSCDX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Sit, while SSMGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Sit. Over the past 10 years, SSCDX returned 10.51%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for SSMGX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SSCDX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SSMGX.

Performance

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCDX achieves a 17.23% return, which is significantly higher than SSMGX's 16.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSCDX having a 10.51% annualized return and SSMGX not far ahead at 10.81%.

SSCDX

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -1.47%
• 6M: 9.85%
• YTD: 17.23%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: 10.51%
• ALL TIME*: 9.65%

SSMGX

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 9.93%
• YTD: 16.25%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: 10.81%
• ALL TIME*: 8.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	17.23%	12.90%	15.50%	15.50%	-17.15%	23.46%	16.21%	27.12%	-17.10%	13.69%
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund	16.25%	9.40%	13.42%	16.93%	-25.59%	15.80%	35.97%	29.19%	-10.88%	15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCDX and SSMGX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2015	0.93

The correlation between SSCDX and SSMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSCDX vs. SSMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSCDX

SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 68
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SSMGX

SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCDX	SSMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.10	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.64	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.15	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.94	7.28	+2.66

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the SSMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCDX and SSMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCDX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum SSMGX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCDX and SSMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCDX	SSMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.79%	-65.75%	+26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.22%	-10.05%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.99%	-26.67%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.06%	-34.37%	+7.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.79%	-35.72%	-3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.51%	-4.86%	+1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-18.96%	+12.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	2.96%	-0.45%

Volatility

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) is 4.59%, while SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that SSCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCDX	SSMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	6.20%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	15.62%	-3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	19.62%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	22.07%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	21.64%	-0.92%

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCDX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SSMGX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCDX vs. SSMGX - Dividend Comparison

SSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than SSMGX's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	1.78%	2.21%	1.79%	1.07%	4.26%	8.47%	0.77%	1.33%	2.69%	0.85%	1.16%	0.87%
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund	4.71%	5.48%	4.69%	3.13%	1.73%	15.89%	3.44%	3.14%	9.80%	6.81%	0.17%	10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCDX and SSMGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SSCDX and SSMGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SSCDX or SSMGX?

SSMGX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to SSCDX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCDX dropped -38.79% vs SSMGX's -65.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.