SSCDX vs. REBYX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SSCDX (Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund) and REBYX (Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSCDX returned 11.18%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for REBYX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCDX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for REBYX.

Performance

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SSCDX having a 20.16% return and REBYX slightly higher at 20.23%. Over the past 10 years, SSCDX has outperformed REBYX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while REBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.

SSCDX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 20.16%
• 6M: 17.28%
• 1Y: 36.42%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

REBYX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 20.23%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	20.16%	12.90%	15.50%	15.50%	-17.15%	23.46%	16.21%	27.12%	-17.10%	13.69%
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	20.23%	8.86%	8.16%	13.81%	-16.14%	26.28%	13.04%	23.74%	-12.22%	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCDX and REBYX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2015	0.94

The correlation between SSCDX and REBYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSCDX vs. REBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCDX

SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

REBYX

REBYX Risk / Return Rank: 71
REBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
REBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
REBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
REBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
REBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) and Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCDX	REBYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.15	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.05	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	4.27	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.16	14.78	+0.37

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the REBYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCDX and REBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCDX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum REBYX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCDX and REBYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCDX	REBYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.79%	-62.03%	+23.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.22%	-9.16%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.99%	-32.68%	+8.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.06%	-32.68%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.79%	-44.79%	+6.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-11.15%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.64%	-0.26%

Volatility

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) is 5.07%, while Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that SSCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCDX	REBYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	5.76%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	13.02%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.53%	18.22%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.12%	22.82%	-2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	23.56%	-2.84%

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCDX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than REBYX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCDX vs. REBYX - Dividend Comparison

SSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than REBYX's 6.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REBYX Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	6.89%	8.28%	13.03%	2.64%	5.30%	31.12%	0.64%	4.46%	18.61%	0.33%	0.88%	8.23%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	1.78%	2.21%	1.79%	1.07%	4.26%	8.47%	0.77%	1.33%	2.69%	0.85%	1.16%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCDX and REBYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SSCDX and REBYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SSCDX or REBYX?

REBYX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to SSCDX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCDX dropped -38.79% vs REBYX's -62.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.