SI=F vs. NUKL.DE
SI=F (Silver Futures) is an asset, while NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure.
Performance
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SI=F is traded in USD, while NUKL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NUKL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
SI=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 38.07%
- 3Y*
- 45.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SI=F Silver Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 10.37% | 71.04% | 30.14% | 27.45% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SI=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUKL.DE
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver Futures (SI=F) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SI=F | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SI=F | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -13.38% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.21% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.46% | — |
Volatility
SI=F vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SI=F | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 42.40% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 34.71% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 34.71% | — |
Find the right allocation for SI=F and NUKL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer