SI=F vs. NFLX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SI=F (Silver Futures) is an asset, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SI=F vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silver Futures (SI=F) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SI=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -7.59%
• YTD: -14.31%
• 6M: -15.60%
• 1Y: -33.72%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 23.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SI=F vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SI=F Silver Futures	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.09%
NFLX Netflix, Inc.	-14.31%	5.19%	83.07%	65.11%	-23.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SI=F and NFLX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	-0.03

Return for Risk

SI=F vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SI=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFLX

NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 8
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SI=F vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver Futures (SI=F) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SI=F	NFLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.81	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.35	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SI=F	NFLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.35%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-40.01%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-24.91%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SI=F	NFLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	33.05%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	43.09%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	41.49%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SI=F and NFLX in my portfolio?

SI=F and NFLX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.