PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYM vs. RMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYM vs. RMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYM achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than RMOP's 3.38% return.


SHYM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.33%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

RMOP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.17%
YTD
3.38%
6M
3.85%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYM vs. RMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SHYM and RMOP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024

0.58

The correlation between SHYM and RMOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYM vs. RMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYM
SHYM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RMOP
RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYM vs. RMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYMRMOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.56

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.87

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

13.86

-5.99

SHYM vs. RMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the RMOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYM and RMOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYMRMOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.70

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.99

-0.72

Drawdowns

SHYM vs. RMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYM drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, which is greater than RMOP's maximum drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYM and RMOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYMRMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.55%

-6.67%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-2.66%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-1.52%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.74%

-0.08%

Volatility

SHYM vs. RMOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) is 0.77%, while Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that SHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYMRMOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.21%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

2.67%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

3.81%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

5.66%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

5.66%

+1.29%

SHYM vs. RMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RMOP's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYM vs. RMOP - Dividend Comparison

SHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than RMOP's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RMOP
Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF
5.20%5.15%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
4.30%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYM and RMOP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMOP has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to SHYM (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYM dropped -22.55% vs RMOP's -6.67%.

On 1-year performance, RMOP leads with 10.23% vs 5.18% for SHYM. On fees, SHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RMOP has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMOP.

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.30% for SHYM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYM and 0.55% for RMOP.

RMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYM and RMOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer