SHYM vs. RMOP
SHYM (iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF) and RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHYM returned 5.18% vs 10.23% for RMOP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RMOP.
Performance
SHYM vs. RMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHYM achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than RMOP's 3.38% return.
SHYM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
RMOP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 10.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHYM vs. RMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 1.93% | 2.58% | 0.03% |
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF | 3.38% | 3.90% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHYM and RMOP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SHYM and RMOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHYM vs. RMOP — Risk / Return Rank
SHYM
RMOP
SHYM vs. RMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHYM | RMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 3.87 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 13.86 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHYM | RMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.70 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.99 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
SHYM vs. RMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYM drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, which is greater than RMOP's maximum drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYM and RMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHYM | RMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.55% | -6.67% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | -2.66% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -1.52% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.74% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SHYM vs. RMOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) is 0.77%, while Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that SHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHYM | RMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.21% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.81% | 2.67% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 3.81% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 5.66% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 5.66% | +1.29% |
SHYM vs. RMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RMOP's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHYM vs. RMOP - Dividend Comparison
SHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than RMOP's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF | 5.20% | 5.15% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 4.30% | 4.55% | 4.35% | 4.35% | 4.01% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHYM and RMOP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMOP has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to SHYM (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYM dropped -22.55% vs RMOP's -6.67%.
On 1-year performance, RMOP leads with 10.23% vs 5.18% for SHYM. On fees, SHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RMOP has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMOP.
RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.30% for SHYM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYM and 0.55% for RMOP.
RMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHYM and RMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer