RMOP vs. RSMC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) and RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMOP is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Rockefeller, while RSMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Rockefeller. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RMOP returned 9.66% vs 15.46% for RSMC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMOP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSMC.

Performance

RMOP vs. RSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMOP achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than RSMC's 14.42% return.

RMOP

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 4.21%
• 1Y: 9.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSMC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 14.42%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 15.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMOP vs. RSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	4.00%	3.90%	-0.41%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	14.42%	-1.02%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RMOP and RSMC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.21

Return for Risk

RMOP vs. RSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMOP

RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 81
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RSMC

RSMC Risk / Return Rank: 28
RSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMOP vs. RSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMOP	RSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	0.90	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	1.38	+2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.16	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	1.48	+2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	4.43	+8.67

RMOP vs. RSMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the RSMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMOP and RSMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMOP vs. RSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMOP drawdown since its inception was -6.67%, smaller than the maximum RSMC drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMOP and RSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMOP	RSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-22.33%	+15.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-10.49%	+7.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-5.13%	+3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	3.49%	-2.75%

Volatility

RMOP vs. RSMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) is 0.91%, while Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that RMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMOP	RSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	4.03%	-3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	12.67%	-10.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	17.31%	-13.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.60%	20.27%	-14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.60%	20.27%	-14.67%

RMOP vs. RSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMOP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RSMC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMOP vs. RSMC - Dividend Comparison

RMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	5.17%	5.15%	1.27%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMOP and RSMC in my portfolio?

RMOP and RSMC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMOP or RSMC?

RSMC has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to RMOP (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMOP dropped -6.67% vs RSMC's -22.33%.

Which ETF is better, RMOP or RSMC?

On 1-year performance, RSMC leads with 15.46% vs 9.66% for RMOP. On fees, RMOP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, RMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RMOP or RSMC?

Over the 1-year period, RSMC has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMOP or RSMC?

RMOP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMOP or RSMC?

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 0.00% for RSMC.

What is the main difference between RMOP and RSMC?

RMOP is categorized as High Yield Muni, while RSMC is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMOP and 0.75% for RSMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.