RMOP vs. WTMY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) and WTMY (WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RMOP returned 8.66% vs 4.66% for WTMY. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMOP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WTMY.

Performance

RMOP vs. WTMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMOP achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than WTMY's 0.37% return.

RMOP

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 2.53%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.82%

WTMY

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.22%
• 6M: -0.75%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	$1.54M	$1.79M	$2.38M
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF	$5.26K	$3.72K	$6.60K

RMOP vs. WTMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	2.99%	3.14%
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF	0.37%	3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RMOP and WTMY is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

RMOP vs. WTMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMOP

RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 88
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 85

WTMY

WTMY Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
WTMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
WTMY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
WTMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
WTMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMOP vs. WTMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMOP	WTMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.76	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.45	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.38	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	1.72	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.91	4.78	+8.13

RMOP vs. WTMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the WTMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMOP and WTMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMOP vs. WTMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMOP drawdown since its inception was -6.67%, which is greater than WTMY's maximum drawdown of -3.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMOP and WTMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMOP	WTMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-3.67%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-2.71%	+0.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-1.71%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-0.83%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.98%	-0.31%

Volatility

RMOP vs. WTMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) is 1.05%, while WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF (WTMY) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that RMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMOP	WTMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	1.23%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.84%	2.19%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63%	2.66%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.50%	3.53%	+1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.50%	3.53%	+1.97%

RMOP vs. WTMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMOP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WTMY's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMOP vs. WTMY - Dividend Comparison

RMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than WTMY's 3.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	5.23%	5.15%	1.27%
WTMY WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal ETF	3.56%	2.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMOP and WTMY in my portfolio?

RMOP and WTMY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMOP or WTMY?

WTMY has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to RMOP (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMOP dropped -6.67% vs WTMY's -3.67%.

Which ETF is better, RMOP or WTMY?

On 1-year performance, RMOP leads with 8.66% vs 4.66% for WTMY. On fees, WTMY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RMOP has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RMOP or WTMY?

Over the 1-year period, RMOP has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMOP or WTMY?

WTMY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMOP or WTMY?

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 3.56% for WTMY.

What is the main difference between RMOP and WTMY?

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMOP and 0.35% for WTMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.