PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYL vs. EASG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYL vs. EASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYL achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than EASG's 8.49% return.


SHYL

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*

EASG

1D
0.20%
1M
0.74%
YTD
8.49%
6M
8.17%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYL vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.35%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-2.50%
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
8.49%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYL and EASG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018

0.66

The correlation between SHYL and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYL vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYL vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYLEASGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.59

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

5.88

+6.99

SHYL vs. EASG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the EASG Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYL and EASG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYL vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYL drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, smaller than the maximum EASG drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYL and EASG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYLEASGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-32.06%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-11.74%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

-16.14%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

-31.42%

+21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.01%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-6.15%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

3.17%

-2.76%

Volatility

SHYL vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) is 0.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that SHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYLEASGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

5.32%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

13.29%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

16.07%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

16.73%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

18.37%

-11.70%

SHYL vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHYL vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison

SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than EASG's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.92%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.92%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYL and EASG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EASG has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SHYL (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYL dropped -19.26% vs EASG's -32.06%.

On 5-year performance, EASG leads with 7.01% vs 4.82% for SHYL. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SHYL has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EASG has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHYL.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.92% for EASG.

SHYL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EASG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHYL and 0.14% for EASG.

SHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYL and EASG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer