PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYG achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYG has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 5.22%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


SHYG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.29%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
5.22%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.72%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%4.60%3.15%9.93%0.02%5.11%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG and SCHG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.65

The correlation between SHYG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYGSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.14

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

3.78

+12.25

SHYG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYG drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYG and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYGSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-34.59%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

-16.41%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-23.39%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.39%

-34.59%

+25.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

-34.59%

+15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.33%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-5.20%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

4.96%

-4.56%

Volatility

SHYG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) is 0.98%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SHYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYGSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

5.14%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

12.30%

-9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

15.95%

-12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

22.33%

-16.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

21.58%

-15.16%

SHYG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.00%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG and SCHG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SHYG (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYG dropped -19.26% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 5.22% for SHYG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SHYG.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SHYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SHYG and 0.04% for SCHG.

SHYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer