SHW vs. WMT
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.58%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for WMT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 13.58%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 28.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
SHW vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and WMT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SHW and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.72B
WMT:
$968.20B
SHW:
$10.42
WMT:
$2.88
SHW:
30.45
WMT:
42.04
SHW:
2.96
WMT:
2.75
SHW:
3.31
WMT:
1.34
SHW:
17.77
WMT:
10.26
SHW:
$23.94B
WMT:
$725.31B
SHW:
$11.76B
WMT:
$181.16B
SHW:
$4.29B
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
WMT
SHW vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.23 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.83 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 5.82 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -77.14% | +25.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -15.75% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -21.93% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -25.74% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -25.74% | -16.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -9.81% | -9.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -14.63% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 4.94% | +5.34% |
Volatility
SHW vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 9.00%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 9.86% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 18.49% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 23.67% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 21.68% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 21.73% | +4.85% |
Dividends
SHW vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
SHW vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and WMT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs WMT's -77.14%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer