SHW vs. SNA
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while SNA operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.58%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for SNA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. SNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SNA's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed SNA with an annualized return of 13.58%, while SNA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.41% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
SNA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
SHW vs. SNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 13.93% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 19.54% | -14.86% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and SNA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.39 |
The correlation between SHW and SNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.72B
SNA:
$20.42B
SHW:
$10.42
SNA:
$19.35
SHW:
30.45
SNA:
20.03
SHW:
2.96
SNA:
3.04
SHW:
3.31
SNA:
4.00
SHW:
17.77
SNA:
3.43
SHW:
$23.94B
SNA:
$5.12B
SHW:
$11.76B
SNA:
$2.63B
SHW:
$4.29B
SNA:
$1.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. SNA — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
SNA
SHW vs. SNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Snap-on Incorporated (SNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.21 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.93 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 7.51 | -8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. SNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum SNA drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and SNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -65.76% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -8.47% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -20.77% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -20.77% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -47.38% | +4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -0.16% | -19.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -13.87% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 3.36% | +6.92% |
Volatility
SHW vs. SNA - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) at 5.51%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | SNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 5.51% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 14.82% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 21.36% | +4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 23.91% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 27.18% | -0.60% |
Dividends
SHW vs. SNA - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SNA's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Financials
SHW vs. SNA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Snap-on Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. SNA - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 608.30M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 250.80M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and SNA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to SNA (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs SNA's -65.76%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and SNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer