SHV vs. EMLC
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHV returned 2.23%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.
Performance
SHV vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 1.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SHV having a 2.23% annualized return and EMLC not far ahead at 2.28%.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 8.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
SHV vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.53% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and EMLC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.06 |
The correlation between SHV and EMLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
EMLC
SHV vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHV | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +147.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 53.77 | 1.24 | +52.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 431.38 | 1.42 | +429.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,419.80 | 4.75 | +2,415.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHV vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -32.43% | +31.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -6.19% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -9.15% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.39% | -24.70% | +24.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | -26.47% | +26.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.83% | +3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -14.35% | +14.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.86% | -1.86% |
Volatility
SHV vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.04%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 2.44% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 6.17% | -6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 7.06% | -6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 9.14% | -8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 10.04% | -9.76% |
SHV vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHV vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and EMLC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLC has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to SHV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
On 10-year performance, EMLC leads with 2.28% vs 2.23% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMLC has performed better with a 2.28% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMLC.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.
SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while EMLC is Emerging Markets Bonds. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.30% for EMLC.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer