SHV vs. DAC
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while DAC (Danaos Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SHV returned 2.23%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for DAC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SHV vs. DAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than DAC's 41.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SHV has underperformed DAC with an annualized return of 2.23%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
DAC
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 41.94%
- 1Y
- 52.23%
- 3Y*
- 31.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
SHV vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.53% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
DAC Danaos Corporation | 41.54% | 22.24% | 12.41% | 47.51% | -26.57% | 256.10% | 133.44% | -12.57% | -48.28% | -45.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and DAC is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
DAC
SHV vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHV | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +16.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +145.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 53.77 | 1.42 | +52.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 431.38 | 4.52 | +426.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,419.80 | 14.35 | +2,405.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHV vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and DAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -99.42% | +98.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -12.58% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -28.87% | +28.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.39% | -50.14% | +49.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | -95.81% | +95.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -66.36% | +66.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -80.43% | +80.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.95% | -3.95% |
Volatility
SHV vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.04%, while Danaos Corporation (DAC) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | DAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 6.04% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 16.51% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 21.41% | -21.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 34.36% | -34.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 65.00% | -64.72% |
Dividends
SHV vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than DAC's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 2.70% | 3.66% | 4.06% | 4.12% | 5.70% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and DAC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAC has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SHV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs DAC's -99.42%.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and DAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer