SHUS vs. THNQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SHUS (Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while THNQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. SHUS is actively managed, while THNQ is passively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 18.95% vs 60.05% for THNQ. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SHUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

SHUS vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 36.93% return.

SHUS

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 8.10%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.87%

THNQ

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -1.41%
• 6M: 34.46%
• YTD: 36.93%
• 1Y: 60.05%
• 3Y*: 34.28%
• 5Y*: 14.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	$376.99	$481.64	$2.74K
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	$2.07M	$1.78M	$2.51M

SHUS vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	11.99%	10.89%	-2.65%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	36.93%	29.83%	5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and THNQ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.51

The correlation between SHUS and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHUS vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHUS	THNQ
Technology	15.9%	78.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	12.8%	-
Healthcare	12.7%	3.8%
Industrials	10.7%	1.3%
Financial Services	10.4%	0.9%
Utilities	6.4%	-
Communication Services	6.3%	4.3%
Energy	6.0%	-
Real Estate	3.5%	1.3%
Basic Materials	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 76
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 79
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHUS vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHUS	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.01	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.58	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.28	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	9.32	+0.55

SHUS vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-50.56%	+36.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-18.39%	+11.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-7.04%	+6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-14.87%	+12.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	6.46%	-4.54%

Volatility

SHUS vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) is 2.87%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that SHUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	9.92%	-7.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	24.75%	-17.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	30.07%	-19.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.41%	29.84%	-17.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	28.98%	-16.57%

SHUS vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHUS vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	1.23%	1.37%	0.26%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and THNQ in my portfolio?

SHUS and THNQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHUS or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to SHUS (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or THNQ?

On 1-year performance, THNQ leads with 60.05% vs 18.95% for SHUS. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SHUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or THNQ?

Over the 1-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 60.05% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SHUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or THNQ?

SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between SHUS and THNQ?

SHUS is categorized as Equity Hedged, while THNQ is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SHUS and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.