SHUS vs. DWAT
SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Syntax Advisors, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. SHUS charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
SHUS vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SHUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHUS vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 2.73% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
SHUS vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHUS
DWAT
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SHUS
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
SHUS
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
SHUS
DWAT
Healthcare
SHUS
DWAT
Industrials
SHUS
DWAT
Financial Services
SHUS
DWAT
Energy
SHUS
DWAT
Communication Services
SHUS
DWAT
Utilities
SHUS
DWAT
Real Estate
SHUS
DWAT
Basic Materials
SHUS
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHUS vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
SHUS
DWAT
SHUS vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHUS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHUS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SHUS vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHUS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | 0.00% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | 0.00% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
SHUS vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHUS | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 0.00% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 0.00% | +12.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 0.00% | +12.61% |
SHUS vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHUS vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SHUS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHUS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
SHUS is categorized as Hedge Fund, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SHUS and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for SHUS and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer