SHPP vs. SRVR
SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHPP returned 13.21%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for SRVR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
SHPP vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SHPP vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 17.15% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SHPP and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHPP vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHPP
SRVR
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SHPP
SRVR
Technology
SHPP
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
SHPP
SRVR
-
Basic Materials
SHPP
-
SRVR
Communication Services
SHPP
-
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
SHPP
-
SRVR
-
Energy
SHPP
-
SRVR
Financial Services
SHPP
-
SRVR
Healthcare
SHPP
-
SRVR
-
Real Estate
SHPP
-
SRVR
Utilities
SHPP
-
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
SRVR
SHPP vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHPP | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.13 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.76 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 1.64 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHPP | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.67 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -40.99% | +19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -14.78% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -18.34% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -12.28% | +11.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -15.27% | +11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 6.83% | -3.92% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is 4.65%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SHPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.47% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 13.12% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 16.72% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 19.71% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 21.44% | -3.99% |
SHPP vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPP vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than SRVR's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.65% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPP and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SHPP (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPP dropped -21.57% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 3-year performance, SHPP leads with 13.21% vs 8.85% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHPP has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.65% for SHPP.
SHPP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SRVR is REIT. SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.60% for SRVR.
SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPP and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer