SHPP vs. PTLC
SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHPP returned 13.21%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for PTLC. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
SHPP vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 5.53% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
SHPP vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 17.15% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 5.53% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and PTLC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SHPP and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHPP vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHPP
PTLC
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SHPP
PTLC
Technology
SHPP
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
SHPP
PTLC
Basic Materials
SHPP
-
PTLC
Communication Services
SHPP
-
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
SHPP
-
PTLC
Energy
SHPP
-
PTLC
Financial Services
SHPP
-
PTLC
Healthcare
SHPP
-
PTLC
Real Estate
SHPP
-
PTLC
Utilities
SHPP
-
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
PTLC
SHPP vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHPP | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.45 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 9.71 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHPP | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.91 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.70 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -26.63% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -8.77% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -15.17% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.74% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -5.64% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.21% | +0.70% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 2.88%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 2.88% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 8.15% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 11.27% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 11.73% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 13.17% | +4.28% |
SHPP vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPP vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than PTLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.65% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPP and PTLC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHPP has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPP dropped -21.57% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 3-year performance, PTLC leads with 14.93% vs 13.21% for SHPP. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.
SHPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.
SHPP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.60% for PTLC.
PTLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPP and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer