PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UNM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
38.65%
11.19%
UNM
^GSPC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 64.15% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 24.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UNM having a 11.48% annualized return and ^GSPC not far behind at 11.14%.


UNM

YTD

64.15%

1M

14.05%

6M

38.65%

1Y

75.44%

5Y (annualized)

24.29%

10Y (annualized)

11.48%

^GSPC

YTD

24.05%

1M

0.89%

6M

11.19%

1Y

30.12%

5Y (annualized)

13.82%

10Y (annualized)

11.14%

Key characteristics


UNM^GSPC
Sharpe Ratio3.652.54
Sortino Ratio4.953.40
Omega Ratio1.681.47
Calmar Ratio4.183.66
Martin Ratio21.4716.28
Ulcer Index3.46%1.91%
Daily Std Dev20.32%12.25%
Max Drawdown-89.38%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-1.52%-1.41%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between UNM and ^GSPC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UNM, currently valued at 3.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.652.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for UNM, currently valued at 4.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.953.40
The chart of Omega ratio for UNM, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.681.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for UNM, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.183.66
The chart of Martin ratio for UNM, currently valued at 21.47, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0021.4716.28
UNM
^GSPC

The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.65
2.54
UNM
^GSPC

Drawdowns

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.52%
-1.41%
UNM
^GSPC

Volatility

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Unum Group (UNM) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.07%. This indicates that UNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.71%
4.07%
UNM
^GSPC