UNM vs. AFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Unum Group (UNM) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL).
Performance
UNM vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNM vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNM Unum Group | -5.20% | 8.56% | 66.31% | 13.72% | 73.56% | 11.87% | -16.22% | 2.63% | -45.22% | 27.19% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 0.02% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Fundamentals
UNM:
$12.27B
AFL:
$58.37B
UNM:
$4.32
AFL:
$6.83
UNM:
16.91
AFL:
16.07
UNM:
1.18
AFL:
4.17
UNM:
0.98
AFL:
3.38
UNM:
1.20
AFL:
1.98
UNM:
$12.76B
AFL:
$17.36B
UNM:
$4.69B
AFL:
$6.71B
UNM:
$1.15B
AFL:
$5.53B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 12.43%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.76% annualized return.
UNM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- -8.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 24.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
AFL
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 0.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNM vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
UNM
AFL
UNM vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | 0.04 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | 0.19 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 0.17 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 0.37 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.04 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.92 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.62 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.48 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNM and AFL is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UNM vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than AFL's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNM Unum Group | 2.46% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 3.07% | 3.07% | 4.76% | 4.97% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 1.57% | 1.75% | 2.10% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
UNM vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than AFL's maximum drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and AFL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.38% | -82.71% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -12.29% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | -19.86% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.06% | -54.89% | -26.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -6.11% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.82% | -11.70% | -21.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | 5.67% | +2.31% |
Volatility
UNM vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Unum Group (UNM) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 4.32%. This indicates that UNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 4.32% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 11.80% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 20.45% | +8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 20.86% | +9.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.64% | 25.70% | +11.94% |
Financials
UNM vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unum Group and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities