PortfoliosLab logo
UNM vs. AFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UNM and AFL is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UNM vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UNM:

2.02

AFL:

0.93

Sortino Ratio

UNM:

2.68

AFL:

1.28

Omega Ratio

UNM:

1.40

AFL:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

UNM:

3.57

AFL:

1.61

Martin Ratio

UNM:

12.24

AFL:

3.59

Ulcer Index

UNM:

4.50%

AFL:

5.65%

Daily Std Dev

UNM:

27.96%

AFL:

22.46%

Max Drawdown

UNM:

-89.38%

AFL:

-82.71%

Current Drawdown

UNM:

-3.13%

AFL:

-8.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UNM:

$14.12B

AFL:

$55.98B

EPS

UNM:

$8.48

AFL:

$6.43

PE Ratio

UNM:

9.47

AFL:

16.10

PEG Ratio

UNM:

2.50

AFL:

0.93

PS Ratio

UNM:

1.10

AFL:

3.31

PB Ratio

UNM:

1.29

AFL:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

UNM:

$12.73B

AFL:

$17.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UNM:

$12.50B

AFL:

$13.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

UNM:

$2.21B

AFL:

$4.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 12.27%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.39% annualized return.


UNM

YTD

11.16%

1M

8.84%

6M

11.79%

1Y

56.15%

3Y*

36.93%

5Y*

45.76%

10Y*

12.27%

AFL

YTD

1.21%

1M

-0.82%

6M

-5.03%

1Y

20.64%

3Y*

26.23%

5Y*

27.45%

10Y*

15.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Unum Group

Aflac Incorporated

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNM vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNM is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNM is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNM is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UNM vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and AFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

UNM vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, which matches AFL's 2.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UNM
Unum Group
2.09%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%1.78%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.09%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%

Drawdowns

UNM vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than AFL's maximum drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UNM vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unum Group (UNM) is 5.77%, while Aflac Incorporated (AFL) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that UNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UNM vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unum Group and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
3.09B
3.40B
(UNM) Total Revenue
(AFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UNM vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Unum Group and Aflac Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
-1.5%
(UNM) Gross Margin
(AFL) Gross Margin
UNM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported a gross profit of 3.09B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of -50.00M and revenue of 3.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.5%.

UNM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported an operating income of 213.30M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

UNM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported a net income of 189.10M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 29.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.