SHOC vs. SCHG
SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHOC returned 53.23%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHOC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SHOC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 69.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.
SHOC
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 18.27%
- YTD
- 69.49%
- 6M
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 141.70%
- 3Y*
- 53.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.74%
SHOC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 69.49% | 49.91% | 16.74% | 61.97% | -1.17% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.78% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOC and SCHG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SHOC and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHOC vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHOC
SCHG
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SHOC
SCHG
Basic Materials
SHOC
-
SCHG
Communication Services
SHOC
-
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SHOC
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SHOC
-
SCHG
Energy
SHOC
-
SCHG
Financial Services
SHOC
-
SCHG
Healthcare
SHOC
-
SCHG
Industrials
SHOC
-
SCHG
Real Estate
SHOC
-
SCHG
Utilities
SHOC
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHOC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SHOC
SCHG
SHOC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHOC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.28 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.77 | 1.51 | +8.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.29 | 5.04 | +31.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHOC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52 | 1.60 | +2.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.85 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
SHOC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -34.59% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | -16.41% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.54% | -23.39% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.44% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -5.20% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 4.90% | -0.98% |
Volatility
SHOC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHOC | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 3.61% | +8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.73% | 11.62% | +13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.56% | 15.49% | +16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.17% | 22.26% | +12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.17% | 21.55% | +13.62% |
SHOC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHOC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHOC and SCHG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHOC has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOC dropped -37.54% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 53.23% vs 25.14% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 53.23% return vs 25.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 0.04% for SCHG.
SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHOC and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer