SHNY vs. BABX
SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) and BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHNY is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past 3 years, SHNY returned 59.66%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for BABX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHNY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BABX.
Performance
SHNY vs. BABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -14.45% return, which is significantly higher than BABX's -32.66% return.
SHNY
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -14.45%
- 6M
- -10.44%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 59.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX
- 1D
- -5.49%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- YTD
- -32.66%
- 6M
- -42.73%
- 1Y
- -3.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHNY vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN | -14.45% | 214.54% | 50.30% | 12.52% |
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -32.66% | 123.85% | 1.23% | -39.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHNY and BABX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHNY vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank
SHNY
BABX
SHNY vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHNY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.07 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | -0.05 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | -0.10 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHNY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | -0.04 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | -0.02 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
SHNY vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, smaller than the maximum BABX drawdown of -70.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and BABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHNY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.99% | -70.62% | +15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.99% | -64.86% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.99% | -64.86% | +9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.99% | -61.99% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -45.24% | +30.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.66% | 36.29% | -10.63% |
Volatility
SHNY vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) is 16.40%, while GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a volatility of 29.31%. This indicates that SHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHNY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | 29.31% | -12.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.87% | 57.74% | +13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.80% | 87.52% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 83.12% | -24.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 83.12% | -24.76% |
SHNY vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHNY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHNY vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SHNY nor BABX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHNY and BABX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (29.31%) compared to SHNY (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -54.99% vs BABX's -70.62%.
On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 59.66% vs 6.70% for BABX. On fees, SHNY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SHNY has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 59.66% return vs 6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHNY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
SHNY and BABX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SHNY is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BABX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SHNY and 1.15% for BABX.
SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHNY and BABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer