SHNY vs. UGL
SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) and UGL (ProShares Ultra Gold) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. Over the past 3 years, SHNY returned 59.66%/yr vs 53.18%/yr for UGL. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SHNY vs. UGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -14.45% return, which is significantly lower than UGL's -2.16% return.
SHNY
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -14.45%
- 6M
- -10.44%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 59.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGL
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 51.67%
- 3Y*
- 53.18%
- 5Y*
- 27.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
SHNY vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN | -14.45% | 214.54% | 50.30% | 12.52% |
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | -2.16% | 137.57% | 46.36% | 16.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHNY and UGL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between SHNY and UGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHNY vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank
SHNY
UGL
SHNY vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHNY | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.38 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.93 | 3.17 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHNY | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.98 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.39 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
SHNY vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, smaller than the maximum UGL drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and UGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHNY | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.99% | -75.93% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.99% | -37.56% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.99% | -37.56% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.99% | -36.56% | -18.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -43.63% | +28.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.66% | 16.35% | +9.31% |
Volatility
SHNY vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) at 11.03%. This indicates that SHNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHNY | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | 11.03% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.87% | 46.81% | +24.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.80% | 52.91% | +25.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 36.18% | +22.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.36% | 32.34% | +26.02% |
SHNY vs. UGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SHNY and UGL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SHNY vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SHNY nor UGL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SHNY and UGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SHNY has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to UGL (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -54.99% vs UGL's -75.93%.
On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 59.66% vs 53.18% for UGL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UGL has been the lower-risk option at 11.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 59.66% return vs 53.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHNY and UGL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SHNY and UGL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.
UGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHNY and UGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer