PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHM vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
0.11%3.95%1.22%2.92%-3.82%-0.37%0.30%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -5.92% return.


SHM

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
1.16%

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHM vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SHM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHM
SHM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHMQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.06

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.65

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.89

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.17

6.96

-0.79

SHM vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHM and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHMQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.06

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.59

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.63

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between SHM and QQQM is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SHM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
2.64%2.61%2.06%1.15%0.69%0.86%1.24%1.40%1.23%1.06%0.94%0.92%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SHM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHMQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-35.04%

+23.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-12.55%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.67%

-35.04%

+28.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-8.99%

+7.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-8.47%

+7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.41%

-2.88%

Volatility

SHM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) is 0.53%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that SHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHMQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

6.48%

-5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.89%

12.73%

-11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83%

22.42%

-20.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

22.25%

-20.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

22.27%

-18.96%