PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SHM vs. VCSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SHMVCSH
YTD Return1.40%4.34%
1Y Return3.70%7.92%
3Y Return (Ann)0.19%1.49%
5Y Return (Ann)0.75%1.89%
10Y Return (Ann)1.01%2.29%
Sharpe Ratio1.753.13
Sortino Ratio2.675.08
Omega Ratio1.341.65
Calmar Ratio1.081.93
Martin Ratio6.0318.93
Ulcer Index0.65%0.42%
Daily Std Dev2.23%2.55%
Max Drawdown-11.61%-12.86%
Current Drawdown-0.86%-1.10%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SHM and VCSH is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SHM vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 1.01%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.96%
3.61%
SHM
VCSH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHM vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for SHM: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for VCSH: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SHM vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SHM, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.75
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SHM, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SHM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SHM, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SHM, currently valued at 6.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.03
VCSH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 5.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 18.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.93

SHM vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHM and VCSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.75
3.13
SHM
VCSH

Dividends

SHM vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than VCSH's 3.82% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
1.89%1.22%0.76%1.00%1.65%1.41%1.33%1.15%1.02%0.91%0.92%0.98%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
3.82%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.25%2.10%2.08%2.01%2.05%

Drawdowns

SHM vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and VCSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.86%
-1.10%
SHM
VCSH

Volatility

SHM vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.67%. This indicates that SHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%0.90%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.87%
0.67%
SHM
VCSH