SHM vs. VCSH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH).
SHM and VCSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. VCSH is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. Both SHM and VCSH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHM or VCSH.
Correlation
The correlation between SHM and VCSH is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SHM vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SHM:
0.91
VCSH:
2.28
SHM:
1.29
VCSH:
3.42
SHM:
1.17
VCSH:
1.44
SHM:
0.65
VCSH:
4.19
SHM:
2.78
VCSH:
10.41
SHM:
0.66%
VCSH:
0.50%
SHM:
2.04%
VCSH:
2.30%
SHM:
-11.61%
VCSH:
-12.86%
SHM:
-0.86%
VCSH:
-0.40%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than VCSH's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 0.97%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return.
SHM
0.19%
0.05%
1.23%
1.92%
0.59%
0.97%
VCSH
0.15%
0.51%
2.61%
5.20%
1.89%
2.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHM vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHM vs. VCSH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SHM
VCSH
SHM vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHM vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison
SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than VCSH's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF | 2.05% | 2.06% | 1.22% | 0.76% | 1.00% | 1.65% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.15% | 1.10% | 0.91% | 0.92% |
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.96% | 3.96% | 3.09% | 2.01% | 1.81% | 2.27% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.10% | 2.08% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
SHM vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and VCSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHM vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) have volatilities of 0.68% and 0.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.