SHM vs. VCSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHM (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF) and VCSH (Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short, while VCSH is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHM returned 1.20%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for VCSH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCSH.

Performance

SHM vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than VCSH's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SHM has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 1.20%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.70% annualized return.

SHM

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 3.47%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 0.91%
• 10Y*: 1.20%

VCSH

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 4.59%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHM vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	0.78%	3.95%	1.22%	2.92%	-3.82%	-0.37%	2.65%	3.64%	1.56%	0.99%
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.64%	6.77%	4.91%	6.20%	-5.62%	-0.63%	5.13%	7.02%	0.92%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SHM and VCSH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009	0.33

The correlation between SHM and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SHM vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHM

SHM Risk / Return Rank: 75
SHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SHM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SHM Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VCSH

VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 74
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHM vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHM	VCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.45	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	3.85	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.48	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.29	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.88	13.55	-5.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHM vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHM and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHM	VCSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.45	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.81	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.81	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.02	-0.54

Drawdowns

SHM vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and VCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHM	VCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-12.86%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.13%	-1.40%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.03%	-1.40%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.67%	-9.48%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.61%	-12.86%	+1.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.32%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-0.97%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.34%	+0.10%

Volatility

SHM vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) is 0.35%, while Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a volatility of 0.57%. This indicates that SHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHM	VCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	0.57%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.85%	1.38%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26%	1.88%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.07%	2.88%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	3.35%	-0.04%

SHM vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SHM vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than VCSH's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHM SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF	2.67%	2.61%	2.06%	1.15%	0.69%	0.86%	1.24%	1.40%	1.23%	1.06%	0.94%	0.92%
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.45%	4.35%	3.96%	3.09%	2.01%	1.81%	2.27%	2.87%	2.65%	2.26%	2.10%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHM and VCSH in my portfolio?

SHM and VCSH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHM or VCSH?

VCSH has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to SHM (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHM dropped -11.61% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

Which ETF is better, SHM or VCSH?

On 10-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.70% vs 1.20% for SHM. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SHM has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHM or VCSH?

Over the 10-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.70% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHM or VCSH?

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHM or VCSH?

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 2.67% for SHM.

What is the main difference between SHM and VCSH?

SHM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VCSH is Corporate Bonds. SHM tracks Bloomberg Municipal Managed Money Short, while VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHM and 0.04% for VCSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.