PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SHM vs. JMST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SHM and JMST is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

SHM vs. JMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.30%
1.56%
SHM
JMST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SHM:

0.81

JMST:

4.90

Sortino Ratio

SHM:

1.16

JMST:

8.63

Omega Ratio

SHM:

1.15

JMST:

2.21

Calmar Ratio

SHM:

0.59

JMST:

20.38

Martin Ratio

SHM:

2.65

JMST:

89.28

Ulcer Index

SHM:

0.63%

JMST:

0.04%

Daily Std Dev

SHM:

2.07%

JMST:

0.70%

Max Drawdown

SHM:

-11.61%

JMST:

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

SHM:

-0.76%

JMST:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHM achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than JMST's 0.10% return.


SHM

YTD

0.08%

1M

-0.28%

6M

1.31%

1Y

1.96%

5Y*

0.61%

10Y*

1.00%

JMST

YTD

0.10%

1M

0.12%

6M

1.56%

1Y

3.39%

5Y*

1.84%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHM vs. JMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JMST's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for SHM: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for JMST: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SHM vs. JMST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SHM is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SHM is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SHM is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SHM is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SHM is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SHM is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JMST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JMST is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JMST is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JMST is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JMST is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JMST is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JMST is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SHM vs. JMST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SHM, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.814.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for SHM, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.168.63
The chart of Omega ratio for SHM, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.152.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for SHM, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.5920.38
The chart of Martin ratio for SHM, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.6589.28
SHM
JMST

The current SHM Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the JMST Sharpe Ratio of 4.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHM and JMST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.81
4.90
SHM
JMST

Dividends

SHM vs. JMST - Dividend Comparison

SHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than JMST's 3.31% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
2.06%2.06%1.22%0.76%1.00%1.65%1.41%1.33%1.15%1.02%0.91%0.92%
JMST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF
3.31%3.32%3.09%1.11%0.27%0.87%1.63%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SHM vs. JMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHM drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, which is greater than JMST's maximum drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHM and JMST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.40%-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.76%
0
SHM
JMST

Volatility

SHM vs. JMST - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) at 0.20%. This indicates that SHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.69%
0.20%
SHM
JMST
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab