SHIP vs. RYCEY
SHIP (Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — SHIP in Marine Shipping, RYCEY in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, SHIP returned -41.99%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 82.14% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SHIP has underperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of -41.99%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.
SHIP
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 82.14%
- 6M
- 73.58%
- 1Y
- 151.48%
- 3Y*
- 65.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- -41.99%
RYCEY
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 15.31%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 48.50%
- 3Y*
- 113.04%
- 5Y*
- 61.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 82.14% | 38.48% | -3.81% | 61.04% | -36.53% | 70.83% | -93.89% | -92.71% | -51.66% | -9.57% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 12.43% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHIP and RYCEY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
SHIP:
$345.21M
RYCEY:
$147.86B
SHIP:
$1.00
RYCEY:
£0.99
SHIP:
16.52
RYCEY:
13.26
SHIP:
0.05
RYCEY:
0.03
SHIP:
2.16
RYCEY:
2.77
SHIP:
1.23
RYCEY:
40.55
SHIP:
$158.10M
RYCEY:
£40.04B
SHIP:
$62.63M
RYCEY:
£10.10B
SHIP:
$78.01M
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHIP vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
SHIP
RYCEY
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHIP | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.23 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.33 | 2.13 | +6.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.43 | 5.98 | +14.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHIP | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.07% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.56% | -21.75% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.61% | -23.37% | -34.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -62.01% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -94.64% | -5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -77.68% | -22.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.56% | -84.15% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 7.73% | -0.18% |
Volatility
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a higher volatility of 16.12% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 12.00%. This indicates that SHIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHIP | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 12.00% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.91% | 32.70% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.69% | 37.88% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.91% | 43.48% | +8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.54% | 49.35% | +49.19% |
Dividends
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than RYCEY's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 2.60% | 3.58% | 10.58% | 1.28% | 25.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHIP vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
SHIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
SHIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
SHIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHIP and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHIP has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHIP and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer