SHIP vs. RDVT
SHIP (Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.) and RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) are both stocks. SHIP operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while RDVT operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SHIP returned 14.11%/yr vs 23.87%/yr for RDVT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHIP vs. RDVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 60.95% return, which is significantly higher than RDVT's 16.75% return.
SHIP
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 58.55%
- YTD
- 60.95%
- 1Y
- 122.81%
- 3Y*
- 47.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -45.38%
- ALL TIME*
- -36.92%
RDVT
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 32.45%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 47.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
SHIP vs. RDVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 60.95% | 38.48% | -3.81% | 61.04% | -36.53% | 70.83% | -93.89% | -92.71% | -45.36% |
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 16.75% | 58.63% | 81.27% | -13.25% | -42.00% | 52.01% | 41.06% | 174.63% | -76.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHIP and RDVT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
SHIP:
$304.25M
RDVT:
$938.10M
SHIP:
$1.78
RDVT:
$0.97
SHIP:
8.09
RDVT:
68.23
SHIP:
0.02
RDVT:
0.13
SHIP:
1.69
RDVT:
10.23
SHIP:
1.04
RDVT:
9.16
SHIP:
$176.75M
RDVT:
$94.08M
SHIP:
$79.31M
RDVT:
$79.25M
SHIP:
$96.51M
RDVT:
$23.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHIP vs. RDVT — Risk / Return Rank
SHIP
RDVT
SHIP vs. RDVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHIP | RDVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | 1.11 | +5.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | 2.52 | +12.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHIP vs. RDVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than RDVT's maximum drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and RDVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHIP | RDVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -90.17% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -42.11% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.61% | -42.11% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -63.73% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -3.23% | -96.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.63% | -49.83% | -36.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 18.46% | -10.07% |
Volatility
SHIP vs. RDVT - Volatility Comparison
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) at 11.06%. This indicates that SHIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHIP | RDVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 11.06% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.01% | 36.89% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.44% | 45.88% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.56% | 49.32% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.94% | 71.08% | +26.86% |
Dividends
SHIP vs. RDVT - Dividend Comparison
SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 4.02% | 3.58% | 10.58% | 1.28% | 25.23% |
Financials
SHIP vs. RDVT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Red Violet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHIP vs. RDVT - Profitability Comparison
SHIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 19.29M and revenue of 42.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
RDVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.
SHIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 11.75M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
RDVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
SHIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 9.50M and revenue of 42.85M, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.
RDVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHIP and RDVT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHIP has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to RDVT (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs RDVT's -90.17%.
SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHIP and RDVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer