SHFS vs. META

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SHFS (SHF Holdings Inc) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. SHFS operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, SHFS returned -74.08%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for META. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

SHFS vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHFS achieves a -82.66% return, which is significantly lower than META's -15.51% return.

SHFS

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -23.99%
• 6M: -83.73%
• YTD: -82.66%
• 1Y: -93.20%
• 3Y*: -74.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -75.60%

META

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -4.49%
• 6M: -22.16%
• YTD: -15.51%
• 1Y: -25.53%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: 16.39%
• ALL TIME*: 20.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	$9.87B	$11.79B	$10.93B
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	$45.85K	$213.31K	$940.48K

SHFS vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	-82.66%	-88.23%	-68.29%	-20.00%	-82.37%	2.44%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-15.51%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	-5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SHFS and META is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2021	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHFS : $609.04K META : $1.42T
EPS SHFS : -$0.82 META : $26.51
PS Ratio SHFS : 0.06 META : 6.27
PB Ratio SHFS : 0.07 META : 5.47
Total Revenue (TTM) SHFS : $9.05M META : $228.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHFS : $4.35M META : $186.59B
EBITDA (TTM) SHFS : -$3.11M META : $107.07B

Return for Risk

SHFS vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHFS

SHFS Risk / Return Rank: 11
SHFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SHFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SHFS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SHFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
SHFS Martin Ratio Rank: 15

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 11
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
META Omega Ratio Rank: 14
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
META Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHFS vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHFS	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.73	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.43	-0.91	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.89	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	-0.84	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	-1.52	+0.32

SHFS vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is comparable to the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHFS and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHFS vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHFS drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHFS and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHFS	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-76.74%	-23.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.66%	-33.30%	-64.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.40%	-34.15%	-65.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.92%	-29.30%	-70.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.72%	-15.90%	-57.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.61%	18.25%	+59.36%

Volatility

SHFS vs. META - Volatility Comparison

SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) has a higher volatility of 19.93% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 15.37%. This indicates that SHFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHFS	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.93%	15.37%	+4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	90.05%	30.29%	+59.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	180.51%	39.78%	+140.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.10%	44.68%	+85.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.10%	39.10%	+91.00%

Dividends

SHFS vs. META - Dividend Comparison

SHFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.38%	0.32%	0.34%
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHFS and META in my portfolio?

SHFS and META have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHFS or META?

SHFS has higher volatility (19.93%) compared to META (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHFS dropped -99.92% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.