PortfoliosLab logo
SHFS vs. TMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SHFS and TMC is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SHFS vs. TMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SHFS:

-0.59

TMC:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

SHFS:

-1.21

TMC:

3.12

Omega Ratio

SHFS:

0.87

TMC:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

SHFS:

-0.82

TMC:

2.02

Martin Ratio

SHFS:

-1.68

TMC:

6.82

Ulcer Index

SHFS:

48.32%

TMC:

27.91%

Daily Std Dev

SHFS:

136.71%

TMC:

109.64%

Max Drawdown

SHFS:

-99.16%

TMC:

-95.58%

Current Drawdown

SHFS:

-98.78%

TMC:

-64.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHFS:

$7.74M

TMC:

$2.16B

EPS

SHFS:

-$18.28

TMC:

-$0.23

PS Ratio

SHFS:

0.55

TMC:

0.00

PB Ratio

SHFS:

0.81

TMC:

173.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHFS:

$14.93M

TMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHFS:

-$2.52T

TMC:

-$80.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHFS:

$215.16K

TMC:

-$54.58M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHFS achieves a -69.11% return, which is significantly lower than TMC's 299.11% return.


SHFS

YTD

-69.11%

1M

-18.59%

6M

-69.45%

1Y

-80.96%

3Y*

-76.10%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TMC

YTD

299.11%

1M

44.19%

6M

427.12%

1Y

204.08%

3Y*

42.03%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHF Holdings Inc

TMC the metals company Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SHFS vs. TMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SHFS is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SHFS is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SHFS is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SHFS is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SHFS is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SHFS is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMC is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMC is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMC is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMC is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMC is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMC is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SHFS vs. TMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SHFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the TMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHFS and TMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SHFS vs. TMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHFS nor TMC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SHFS vs. TMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHFS drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TMC drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHFS and TMC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SHFS vs. TMC - Volatility Comparison

SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) has a higher volatility of 36.61% compared to TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) at 29.09%. This indicates that SHFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SHFS vs. TMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SHF Holdings Inc and TMC the metals company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-40.00M-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
3.70M
0
(SHFS) Total Revenue
(TMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items