SHFS vs. CMPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHFS (SHF Holdings Inc) and CMPS (COMPASS Pathways plc) are both stocks. SHFS operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CMPS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, SHFS returned -64.84%/yr vs 17.21%/yr for CMPS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SHFS vs. CMPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHFS achieves a -58.43% return, which is significantly lower than CMPS's 83.91% return.

SHFS

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -46.03%
• YTD: -58.43%
• 6M: -67.60%
• 1Y: -83.44%
• 3Y*: -64.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMPS

• 1D: -4.80%
• 1M: 33.30%
• YTD: 83.91%
• 6M: 149.31%
• 1Y: 176.47%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: -17.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHFS vs. CMPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	-58.43%	-88.23%	-68.29%	-20.00%	-82.37%	1.92%
CMPS COMPASS Pathways plc	83.91%	82.54%	-56.80%	8.97%	-63.67%	-27.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SHFS and CMPS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021	0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHFS : $1.29M CMPS : $1.65B
EPS SHFS : -$0.83 CMPS : -$1.73
PB Ratio SHFS : 0.16 CMPS : 5.06
Total Revenue (TTM) SHFS : $9.05M CMPS : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) SHFS : $4.35M CMPS : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) SHFS : -$3.11M CMPS : -$312.16M

Return for Risk

SHFS vs. CMPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHFS

SHFS Risk / Return Rank: 17
SHFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SHFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SHFS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SHFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SHFS Martin Ratio Rank: 14

CMPS

CMPS Risk / Return Rank: 85
CMPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CMPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CMPS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CMPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CMPS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHFS vs. CMPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHFS	CMPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	1.72	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.46	2.42	-2.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.37	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	3.48	-4.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	10.52	-11.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHFS vs. CMPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the CMPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHFS and CMPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHFS	CMPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45	1.72	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.55	-0.17	-0.39

Drawdowns

SHFS vs. CMPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHFS drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CMPS drawdown of -96.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHFS and CMPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHFS	CMPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.82%	-96.03%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.47%	-51.04%	-43.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.58%	-81.00%	-17.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.81%	-78.56%	-21.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.91%	-74.12%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.88%	16.85%	+51.03%

Volatility

SHFS vs. CMPS - Volatility Comparison

SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) has a higher volatility of 59.79% compared to COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) at 26.60%. This indicates that SHFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHFS	CMPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	59.79%	26.60%	+33.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.21%	68.66%	+22.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	184.60%	103.22%	+81.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.92%	79.94%	+50.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.92%	81.80%	+49.12%

Dividends

SHFS vs. CMPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHFS nor CMPS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHFS and CMPS in my portfolio?

SHFS and CMPS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHFS or CMPS?

SHFS has higher volatility (59.79%) compared to CMPS (26.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHFS dropped -99.82% vs CMPS's -96.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.