SHFS vs. T

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SHFS (SHF Holdings Inc) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. SHFS operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, SHFS returned -71.91%/yr vs 20.20%/yr for T. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SHFS vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHFS achieves a -77.62% return, which is significantly lower than T's -6.13% return.

SHFS

• 1D: -5.12%
• 1M: -52.53%
• YTD: -77.62%
• 6M: -82.03%
• 1Y: -89.35%
• 3Y*: -71.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

T

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -9.70%
• YTD: -6.13%
• 6M: -4.67%
• 1Y: -15.59%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHFS vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	-77.62%	-88.23%	-68.29%	-20.00%	-82.37%	2.44%
T AT&T Inc.	-6.13%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SHFS and T is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2021	-0.01

Fundamentals

EPS SHFS : -$0.83 T : $3.04
PS Ratio SHFS : 0.08 T : 1.31
Total Revenue (TTM) SHFS : $9.05M T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHFS : $4.35M T : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) SHFS : -$3.11M T : $54.70B

Return for Risk

SHFS vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHFS

SHFS Risk / Return Rank: 14
SHFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SHFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHFS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SHFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SHFS Martin Ratio Rank: 13

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 14
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
T Omega Ratio Rank: 15
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
T Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHFS vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHFS	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.69	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.83	-0.89	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.90	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.66	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	-1.40	+0.15

SHFS vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHFS and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHFS vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHFS drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHFS and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHFS	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.90%	-64.15%	-35.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.80%	-23.57%	-73.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.18%	-23.57%	-75.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-20.80%	-79.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.14%	-15.72%	-57.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.20%	11.14%	+60.06%

Volatility

SHFS vs. T - Volatility Comparison

SHF Holdings Inc (SHFS) has a higher volatility of 41.27% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.49%. This indicates that SHFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHFS	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.27%	8.49%	+32.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.79%	18.37%	+76.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	187.34%	22.66%	+164.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	131.22%	24.12%	+107.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	131.22%	23.79%	+107.43%

Dividends

SHFS vs. T - Dividend Comparison

SHFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHFS SHF Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
T AT&T Inc.	4.87%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHFS and T in my portfolio?

SHFS and T have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHFS or T?

SHFS has higher volatility (41.27%) compared to T (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHFS dropped -99.90% vs T's -64.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.